![]() Ironically, this data might actually be used to improve the project, unlike the generic 'help us provide a better experience' statements in website privacy policies. That's fine, but it should be done in a privacy preserving way (if at all possible).Īudacity have said they will not use Google, Yandex or any other third party (admittedly after a backlash), won't share the data with third parties unless legally obliged to do so, and will default to telemetry off in the app. Why should we accept being tracked online any more than we accept it offline? You can make the excuse about improving the experience for users (which I've never seen it used for) or just be honest and say that it brings in money that is needed to keep the lights on. Web pages don't have to be a lost cause and I don't think we should accept that they are. Maybe look a little closer to home first. Those services use this data to display certain ads for you or track where you are coming from or enhance your experience on our website.Īll logs, emails, comments forms or any other data collected about you when you visit our websites are stored indefinitely. Some of your information are shared with 3rd-party services such as Google Adsense, Google Analytics, and some other plugin developers or service providers we use. We have Google analytics and tracking scripts set up on our websites. However, I find it somewhat ironic that are complaining about it when a quick look at the source of their website shows links to Google Syndicate APIs, Google Fonts, one pixel tracking images and various other tracking scripts from .Ī quick read through their privacy policy includes: Without many of us and our open-source software, their business wouldn't even exist.įirst, let me say that I don't agree with tracking within Audacity. ![]() We expect the same courtesy from the Audacity team. The rest of us FOSS developers keep our software clean and usable. This kind of scummy crap is exactly what we were trying to get away from. If someone starts a fork, I will gladly contribute financially. I am (and many other open-source users are) very happy to pay money. They have also shown that they are even happy to ban under 13 year olds from using their software just so they can comply with this. They seem passionate about data collection. With some of their recent strategies, Audacity seems to be treading on thin ice. Open-source is currently one of the only ways to ensure we can get away from broken systems such as DRM, telemetry and adverts. Likely we have actually spent more money on things like compatible hardware and time retraining on non-proprietary software. It should be emphasized that for many of us open-source users, it is not about the cost or getting something for free.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |